Skip to main content

Companies represented in GILD rooms

Picked by GILD's editors. The first shows how leaders and teams rate it.

All products

AI Coding Agent by Anthropic

Claude Code

Reads, edits and runs code in a repo

GILD score, leaders and teams

+72 Strong positive

55 accounts take a side, out of 139 sources reviewed. Use a task pilot to measure accepted work and review time.

See the evidence

Browse by category

Every product we track, one row per category.

What changed lately, dated, with the original announcement and how practitioners reacted.

Reviews and comparisons

What GILD concluded about one product, or two side by side.

See all
  1. Review, 4 min readClaude Code Review: Where It Changes the Engineering WorkflowBuy Claude Code once tasks and reviews are written down. It ranks first on Terminal-Bench 4.0, and reviewer hours set what a team gets back.Covers: Claude CodeRead: 4 min read
  2. Comparison, 6 min readClaude Code vs Cursor: One Model Family or a Model per Task?Choose Cursor to pick a model per task in one editor, where the picks set the bill; Claude Code keeps every editor, JetBrains included, on Anthropic's models and a per-seat allowance.Covers: Claude Code and CursorRead: 6 min read
  3. Comparison, 3 min readCursor vs GitHub Copilot: New Editor or GitHub-Native Assistant?Default to Copilot, which costs less per seat, keeps every IDE and starts agent work from GitHub issues. Cursor needs the team to work in its own editor, and its Bugbot also reviews on GitLab and Bitbucket.Covers: Cursor and GitHub CopilotRead: 3 min read
  4. Comparison, 2 min readCodeRabbit vs GitHub Copilot Code Review: Dedicated Reviewer or Bundled Feature?GitHub.com teams start with the review already in their Copilot seats. CodeRabbit pays for a seat of its own once code spans other Git platforms.Covers: CodeRabbit and GitHub CopilotRead: 2 min read

Research and guides

What engineering teams report from the field, and how to choose a tool.

See all

Research

How Engineering Teams Are Using Coding Agents

What Fin (formerly Intercom), Spotify, and other named engineering teams report after moving coding agents into team workflows, read against METR's controlled studies.

From 10 public sources, 2 min read

Buyer guide, 2 min read

Choosing an AI code review tool

How to compare automated review tools on the comments engineers act on, noise, data handling, and fit with your review standards.

Covers: CodeRabbit, Greptile and 1 more

Ways in

Every kind of piece GILD publishes, and the next forum in person.